Definition
A glide path is a time-varying asset allocation function that adjusts portfolio risk exposure based on proximity to a target date. The allocation at time t is determined by interpolating between start and end allocations.
Monte Carlo Context: Glide paths affect path-dependent outcomes. A declining equity allocation reduces volatility exposure as the portfolio becomes more sensitive to sequence of returns risk.
Allocation Visualization
Accumulation vs Decumulation Phases
- Accumulation (decades to target): High equity allocation (90-100%) maximizes expected compound growth. Volatility is tolerable because withdrawals are not occurring.
- Transition (~10 years to target): Linear reduction in equity exposure. Each year shifts allocation toward the terminal target.
- Decumulation (post-target): Conservative allocation designed to minimize sequence risk during withdrawal phase.
Human Capital Insight: Your future earning potential is like a bond — stable, predictable income. At age 25, you might have $2M in human capital and $20k in stocks. Your true allocation is 99% bonds. As human capital depletes through time, your financial allocation needs to shift to compensate.
Rising Equity Glide Paths
Research by Kitces and Pfau (2014) suggests a rising equity glide path — sometimes called a "bond tent" — may improve outcomes in decumulation. This contradicts conventional target-date fund wisdom:
Rising Path Logic: Start conservative (30-40% equity) at retirement, increase to 60-70% over 20 years. Early conservatism protects against sequence risk; later growth exposure compensates for inflation over a long retirement.
The intuition: sequence of returns risk is temporary. It matters most in the first 5-10 years of retirement. After that, if the portfolio has survived, a bear market is less threatening because you've already built a cushion. The bond tent provides maximum protection during the vulnerability window, then releases capital for growth when it's safer.
- Declining path: 90% → 45% (traditional target-date approach)
- Rising path: 30% → 60% (Kitces/Pfau research)
- Fixed allocation: 60/40 constant (simple but ignores lifecycle effects)
Volatility Tolerance Considerations
Behavioral Risk: A 100% equity strategy experiences drawdowns of 30-50% during market crashes. Simulations assume the investor does not deviate from the plan during volatility.
- Aggressive (90-100% equity): Higher expected return, 50%+ drawdown risk
- Moderate (60-80% equity): Balanced risk/return, 30-40% drawdown risk
- Conservative (40-60% equity): Lower volatility, reduced long-term growth
